@dreki-gg/pi-plan-mode

Two-phase planning workflow for pi — plan with claude-opus-4-6:medium, execute with gpt-5.5:low, with file-based plan-ledger handoff (default .taskman/plans/, configurable via .taskmanrc)

Packages

Package details

extensionskill

Install @dreki-gg/pi-plan-mode from npm and Pi will load the resources declared by the package manifest.

$ pi install npm:@dreki-gg/pi-plan-mode
Package
@dreki-gg/pi-plan-mode
Version
0.38.1
Published
Jul 20, 2026
Downloads
3,104/mo · 1,202/wk
Author
jalbarrang
License
MIT
Types
extension, skill
Size
331.2 KB
Dependencies
4 dependencies · 3 peers
Pi manifest JSON
{
  "extensions": [
    "./extensions/plan-mode"
  ],
  "skills": [
    "./skills"
  ]
}

Security note

Pi packages can execute code and influence agent behavior. Review the source before installing third-party packages.

README

@dreki-gg/pi-plan-mode

Two-phase planning workflow for pi.

Plan with claude-opus-4-6:medium, execute with gpt-5.5:low. Plans are persisted as files in the plan ledger (default .taskman/plans/) for clean context handoff between models.

Install

pi install npm:@dreki-gg/pi-plan-mode

Where plans live (.taskmanrc)

The plans root is resolved the same way the taskman CLI resolves it: the default is .taskman/plans/, overridable per-project by a .taskmanrc JSON file in the working directory whose plans-root value IS the ledger folder (it contains plans.jsonl directly):

{ "plans-root": ".plans" }

Resolution is cwd-only by design — no walk-up, no env var — so the extension, the taskman CLI, and the clean command always agree on which folder holds the ledger. A malformed .taskmanrc fails loudly at load instead of silently writing plans to the wrong place. External-target writes (submit_plan / revise_plan / add_task with target) honour the target repo's own .taskmanrc.

Throughout this README, .taskman/plans/ refers to the resolved plans root.

Recommended companions:

pi install npm:@dreki-gg/pi-questionnaire
pi install npm:@dreki-gg/pi-subagent

What it provides

Feature Name Notes
Flag --plan Start pi in plan mode
Command /plan [prompt] Enter plan mode, optionally with a starting prompt
Command /plan resume Pick up an in-progress plan from disk
Command /plan focus <name> Pin a plan so tracking calls default to it (multi-plan repos)
Command /plans List/filter/sort plans
Command /initiatives List initiatives with member-plan rollup
Command /todos Show current plan progress
Command /prototypes [plan] Reopen a stored prototype in the live viewer
Command /workflow [task] Design and approve a bounded background subagent workflow
Command /workflow save [project|user] [name] Save the latest approved or cancelled draft as a reusable chain
Command /workflow run [project|user] <name> Launch a saved workflow
Command /workflow status|stop|resume Inspect or control the session's current workflow run
Shortcut Ctrl+Alt+P Toggle plan mode
Tool preview_prototype Publish a plan-owned HTML prototype to a live local viewer (immutable versions)
Tool revise_plan Rewrite an existing plan in place (title/handoff/tasks)
Tool update_task Mark a task done / skipped / blocked
Tool update_tasks Mark several tasks done / skipped in one call
Tool add_task Capture a discovered follow-up (deferred)
Tool plan_status Read-only snapshot; progress table when many plans are active
Tool set_active_plan Pin a plan as active (tool form of /plan focus) so tracking calls target it
Tool update_plan Close/reopen a plan: done, superseded, abandoned, in-progress
Tool submit_initiative Create an initiative that groups multiple plans
Tool update_initiative Close/reopen an initiative: done, superseded, abandoned, in-progress
Tool initiative_status Snapshot an initiative: member plans, progress, ready/blocked
Tool reconcile_plans Detect & repair drift between tasks.jsonl and the registry (plans and initiatives)
Tool submit_workflow Validate, inspect/edit, approve, and launch a bounded workflow
Tool workflow_status Read live or persisted workflow run progress and phase checklists

Dynamic Workflow Mode

/workflow <task> is a read-only design mode for large, parallelizable work. It mirrors the core loop of Claude Code dynamic workflows while using @dreki-gg/pi-subagent as the runner:

  1. The agent investigates and proposes a declarative workflow.
  2. The agent writes the workflow JSON to .taskman/workflows/<name>.json, then calls submit_workflow with file: "<name>". The inline workflow object is no longer accepted.
  3. submit_workflow loads and validates that draft, shows the exact JSON, and requires your explicit approval.
  4. The approved version launches in the background with ambient progress: a live widget below the editor shows a spinner, phase checklist, and elapsed time (plus agent counts when the pi-subagent bridge reports them), while a footer indicator (⚙ wf 3/9 <phase>) polls the run every few seconds. The terminal state (completed / failed / stopped) is announced into the conversation with the phase list and a final-output snippet — no manual polling needed. /workflow status, /workflow stop, and /workflow resume still control and inspect the run on demand. The runner also mirrors snapshots to .taskman/workflows/runs/, so agents can call workflow_status for live progress or persisted recovery after a Pi restart.
  5. Workflow drafts in .taskman/workflows/ are temporary and gitignored. /workflow save still stores a reviewed workflow in .pi/chains/<name>.chain.json (project) or ~/.pi/agent/chains/<name>.chain.json (user); /workflow run still replays it.

The workflow format is intentionally bounded: sequential agent steps, static parallel groups, and dynamic fan-out from an earlier named JSON output. Every fan-out must declare maxItems; the validator rejects workflows whose static worst case exceeds 100 agents. Product writes remain blocked until the approved background run starts.

Install the companion runner before using it:

pi install npm:@dreki-gg/pi-subagent

This is not an arbitrary-JavaScript runtime. It does not include Claude Code's ultracode keyword, automatic routing, arbitrary loop/branch scripts, workflow-size configuration, or large-run warning UI.

Prototypes — artifact-style visual review

For visual/UI work, the planner publishes an HTML prototype with preview_prototype({ plan, title, intent, html }). plan is required and must match the draft name later passed to submit_plan — prototypes live with their owning plan and archive with it.

The review loop mirrors Claude Code artifacts, kept entirely local:

  • The first publish opens a live viewer in your browser at a 127.0.0.1 URL (loopback-only, token-guarded, sandboxed iframe with a strict CSP).
  • Every later publish for the same plan/title writes a new immutable version (v001.html, v002.html, …) and the open viewer updates in place over SSE — same tab, no reopen.
  • The viewer offers version navigation (earlier revisions stay browsable), a live-updates toggle, and a feedback box that copies a version-qualified note (Prototype feedback [<slug> v3, plan <plan>]: …) for pasting back into the pi session.

Storage layout (inside the plans root):

<plans-root>/<plan>/prototypes/<slug>/
├── manifest.json   # title, per-version intents, latest version
├── v001.html       # immutable — never overwritten
└── v002.html

The viewer URL is local and session-scoped: it dies with the pi session (/new, /resume, /fork, quit). The versions on disk persist — run /prototypes [plan] in any later session to reopen them under a fresh URL. There is no cloud publishing or sharing; nothing leaves your machine.

Initiatives — grouping large work

When a body of work is too large for a single plan, group it under an initiative. An initiative is one level above a plan; the same projection rule applies one level up:

Initiative  status = projection of its member plans' statuses
   Plan     status = projection of its tasks' statuses
      Task  base state

An initiative is done when it has ≥1 member plan and every member is terminal (done / superseded / abandoned). Member plans link to the initiative by name and carry plan-level depends_on (cross-initiative allowed), so the extension can compute ready work — plans whose dependencies are all done. initiative_status surfaces, per member plan, whether it is ready or blocked by which plans — the view you want when splitting an initiative across sessions or subagents.

# 1. Create the initiative
submit_initiative(name: "auth-overhaul", title: "Auth Overhaul", overview: "...")

# 2. Submit member plans linked + ordered
submit_plan(name: "auth-schema",  initiative: "auth-overhaul")
submit_plan(name: "auth-jwt",     initiative: "auth-overhaul", depends_on_plans: ["auth-schema"])
submit_plan(name: "auth-ui",      initiative: "auth-overhaul", depends_on_plans: ["auth-jwt"])

# 3. See what's ready to pick up
initiative_status(initiative: "auth-overhaul")

Initiative lifecycle mirrors plans: done is projected automatically, while superseded / abandoned (and reopen) are explicit via update_initiative with a reason. The clean CLI archives closed initiatives the same way it archives closed plans.

Plan lifecycle status

The registry (.taskman/plans/plans.jsonl) status is a projection of task state, not a hand-maintained flag. Marking every task done/skipped (via update_task, in any session or model) automatically flips the plan to done — completion is no longer coupled to a formal in-session execution run.

Status Meaning Active?
in-progress Active, tracked, eligible for auto-resolution
done All tasks resolved
superseded Another plan absorbed the work
abandoned Won't do / rejected

superseded / abandoned are set explicitly via update_plan (with a reason) and are never auto-overridden by task reconciliation. Only in-progress plans participate in active-plan resolution.

In repos with many in-progress plans, an explicit { plan: "<name>" } on update_task / add_task / plan_status always targets that plan — it is never silently overridden by whatever plan was last submitted in the session.

Workflow

1. Plan (claude-opus-4-6:medium)

/plan add authentication middleware with JWT support

The planner has access to read-only tools plus edit/write restricted to files inside the plans root. Bash is locked to a strict allowlist of safe commands.

The planner:

  • Inspects the codebase using read-only tools
  • Uses questionnaire when requirements are underspecified
  • Creates .taskman/plans/<kebab-name>/PLAN.md with the full numbered plan
  • Creates .taskman/plans/<kebab-name>/START-PROMPT.md — a self-contained handoff prompt with all context needed to execute without the planning conversation
  • Can add supporting files in the same directory for extra context

2. Choose next step

When the planner finishes, a menu appears:

Option Description
Execute Plan Extract todos from PLAN.md, switch to gpt-5.5:low, start with START-PROMPT.md
Refine Plan Adversarial review — planner critiques its own plan and updates files
Follow up Open an editor for additional instructions to the planner
Exit plan mode Disable plan mode and restore original model

3. Execute (gpt-5.5:low)

When Execute Plan is selected:

  1. Todos are extracted from PLAN.md
  2. Model switches to gpt-5.5:low with full tool access
  3. The executor starts with a clean context window using START-PROMPT.md
  4. Each step must be marked with [DONE:n] before moving to the next
  5. Progress is tracked in a widget in the status bar
  6. When all steps complete, the original model and thinking level are restored

Plan directory structure

.taskman/plans/               # or your .taskmanrc plans-root
├── plans.jsonl               # Plan registry — plan status lifecycle
├── initiatives.jsonl         # Initiative registry — groups member plans
├── auth-overhaul/            # An initiative directory
│   └── INITIATIVE.md         # Initiative overview + plan breakdown
└── auth-jwt/                 # A member plan (linked by name in the registry)
    ├── HANDOFF.md            # Self-contained executor handoff
    ├── tasks.jsonl           # Tasks (gains optional initiative + plan-level depends_on)
    └── ...                   # Optional supporting files

plans.json

The extension automatically maintains the ledger's plans.json to track plan lifecycle:

{
  "add-auth-middleware": {
    "status": "in-progress",
    "title": "Add Authentication Middleware with JWT Support",
    "created": "2026-05-08T12:00:00.000Z",
    "completed": null
  },
  "fix-ci-flakes": {
    "status": "done",
    "title": "Fix CI Flaky Tests",
    "created": "2026-05-07T10:00:00.000Z",
    "completed": "2026-05-07T14:30:00.000Z"
  }
}

Plans start as "in-progress" when created and are marked "done" when all execution steps complete. This prevents accidental deletion of in-flight plans.

Cleaning completed plans

Use the CLI to clean closed plans (done / superseded / abandoned). By default it archives plan directories to .taskman/plans/.archive/<name>/ — keeping HANDOFF.md and tasks.jsonl as a record — rather than deleting them:

# Preview what would be cleaned (no changes)
npx @dreki-gg/pi-plan-mode clean --dry-run

# Archive closed plans to <plans-root>/.archive/ and update plans.jsonl
npx @dreki-gg/pi-plan-mode clean

# Permanently delete instead of archiving
npx @dreki-gg/pi-plan-mode clean --purge

In-flight plans ("status": "in-progress") are never touched. Archiving is the default so that closing out a finished plan never silently destroys its handoff + task ledger.

GitHub Actions

Clean done plans automatically after merge — similar to changesets:

name: Clean Plans

on:
  push:
    branches: [main]
    paths: ['.taskman/plans/**'] # match your .taskmanrc plans-root

jobs:
  clean:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v5
      - uses: actions/setup-node@v4
        with:
          node-version: '24'
      - run: npx @dreki-gg/pi-plan-mode clean
      - name: Commit cleanup
        run: |
          git config user.name "github-actions[bot]"
          git config user.email "github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com"
          git add .taskman/plans/
          git diff --cached --quiet || git commit -m "chore: clean completed plans"
          git push

Should you gitignore the plans root?

No. Commit your plans — they provide decision history and execution context. Use the clean CLI to remove done plans after merge, keeping the directory lean. Plans are execution blueprints, not permanent documentation; for lasting decisions, use ADRs.

Footer indicators

  • 📝 plan — plan mode active (opus-4-6:medium, strict bash)
  • 📋 exec 2/5 — executing plan with gpt-5.5:low, 2 of 5 steps done
  • ⚙ wf 3/9 <phase> — background workflow running, updates every few seconds; flips to ✓ wf completed 9/9 / ✗ wf failed / ◼ wf stopped at the end

Bash safety

In plan mode, bash is restricted to read-only commands (ls, grep, git status, cat, rg, etc.). Destructive commands (rm, mv, git commit, etc.) are blocked.

CLI reference

pi-plan-mode clean [--dry-run] [--purge]
Option Description
clean Archive closed plan directories to <plans-root>/.archive/, update manifest
--dry-run Show what would be cleaned without changing anything
--purge Permanently delete instead of archiving